.
Feedback

Two Developers Take Proposals to Zoning Board

Developer Joseph Iorio displays renditions of a proposed 27-unit, five-story apartment unit at 158 New York Avenue during Thursday’s meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals. (Credit Joseph Kellard)
Developer Joseph Iorio displays renditions of a proposed 27-unit, five-story apartment unit at 158 New York Avenue during Thursday’s meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals. (Credit Joseph Kellard)
This story was corrected and updated at 7:50 a.m. on 10.27.12.

Two developers brought their individual proposals to build multiple-story apartments to the Long Beach Zoning Board of Appeals on Thursday, it what became a nearly five-hour meeting.

First, Joseph and Steven Iorio, Long Beach-based developers with several properties in the city, propose to build a five-story, 27-unit rental garden apartment on their vacant lot at 158 New York Ave., across the street from the Catholic Regional School.  

The second case involved Jan Burman and Steven Krieger of Engel Burman Group, Garden City-based developers who own the Aqua condominiums in the East End, who propose a mixed-use, 10-unit apartment building with a boardwalk-level restaurant at 50 W. Broadway, a vacant lot immediately east of the Allegria Hotel.

Last year the Iorios re-purchased their vacant lot for $1.1 million, and look to build a 60-foot tall apartment building with a total of 43 parking spaces, which they tout as the first “green”-certified building in the area. Rentals will range between $1,100 and $2,700, they said.

At Thursday’s meeting, the brothers faced only residents who oppose their development, most of them from California Avenue, mainly because they believe it would exacerbate existing parking problems, cast shadows on neighboring homes and pose as traffic safety hazard, with its proposed parking lot's exists and entrances on New York Avenue near the school.  

“You need to understand it’s going to have a crushing effect,” James Lynch, a Walks resident, told the zoning board about the project. “The West End is about to explode.”

Long Beach attorney Denis Kelly, who spoke on behalf of West End residents that neighbor the property, questioned the legality of the project, including its change of use from commercial to residential.

During the presentation, Dennis Berkowsky, the Iorios’ attorney, said that the development would benefit everyone in Long Beach, by creating affordable housing and generating tax revenue for the city. Joseph Iorio said the building would bring all utility wires underground, and that it was comparable in height the school’s gymnasium, which some residents disputed. His brother, Steven, noted that the top floor would be set back, out of view from immediate passers-by.

Some zoning board trustees, including Chairman Rocco Morelli, questioned whether the development was too large for the lot and “in character” with the surround neighborhood of many two-story homes, and contended that that parking spaces actually amount to 23, due in part to obstructions. Steven Iorio suggested he could reconstruct the building, at greater cost to their company, in order to eliminate columns to create more spaces in the ground-floor parking area.

Some board trustees suggested the developers consider scaling the project down to four to six individual homes. But Steven Iorio said that they need to borrow money from banks to build the apartments, and that they would likely not get a loan for home development, based on a projected rate of return.

“Financially unless we are able to go to the bank for 27 units here, we will not be able to get a building loan to do that project,” he said. “So scaling it down is not an option.”

Looking to Build Next to the Allegria

Meanwhile, Burman and Krieger, applying for a variance under the limited liability company BK @ Long Beach, purchased the 17,000-square-foot vacant property at 50 W. Broadway for $4.6 million. They plan to build a mixed-use building, at a height of 127 feet, comprised of 10 apartments, one on each floor with 2,700 square feet of living space, and a restaurant.

Each three-bedroom, three-baths unit, with a spacious terrace and panoramic beach view, would started at $2 million. The developers anticipate that all units would sell before the structure is built. 

Architect Angelo Corva said he designed the building to have 23 feet of unobstructed view between it and the Allegria to the west, and 84 feet between it and the White Sands apartment building to the east. The ground floor would have 25 parking spots.

Corva and attorney Albert Dagistino said the restaurant would seat 42 patrons and would be accessible only from the boardwalk, even for residents. They described it as a casual, hamburger-style restaurant and that would only sell liquor at tables, not at a bar.

Some zoning board trustees, as well as residents who oppose the project, expressed concern with the proposed 25 parking spaces, especially with the anticipated restaurant patrons and employees. Burman and Dagistino emphasized that they expect the restaurant would not be a "destination establishment," but rather one used mostly by beach- and boardwalk-goers and neighborhood residents.  

Mona Goodman, a former City Council member who lives across the street from the vacant property, spoke for about 20 fellow residents at the meeting who strongly opposed the project. They mainly believe it is too large and dense and would contribute to an already strangulating parking problem that was made worse after the Allegria Hotel opened more than two years ago.

“We’re choking on this block for parking,” she said. 

Goodman, who submitted a petition with 225 signatures opposing the project, also contended that the number of parking of spaces is only a third of what is required by law. But Dagistino insisted that the project was completely in compliance.

Unlike Iorios’ proposal, though, several people spoke in support of the project. Among them was Norm Brodsky, who said he was the original resident at the Aqua. He said he planned to buy an apartment at the proposed apartment building, in part because it was nearly impossible to find a comparable three-bedroom, three-baths unit in a beachside building on Long Island.

“I think this property will increase property values,” he said.

The zoning board is expected to vote on both proposals at the Nov. 29 meeting. 
Misty October 26, 2012 at 01:15 pm
Is this the same Steve Iorio who is the slumlord on Boyd Street?
Lisa October 26, 2012 at 01:26 pm
each 3 BR unit would started at $2 million" 2 MILLION??? who the F in this economy can afford a 2 million dollar apartment in Long Beach? It ain't the Riviera folks; there's still homeless people and drug culture here. STARTING at 2million? How about building something affordable to up and coming residents don't move out in droves. RE is expensive enough in LB! I thought the Aqua management was nuts with their expensive units. WE NEED AFFORDABLE HOUSING!
Leonard Bauman October 26, 2012 at 01:59 pm
Each of these two projects submitted by developers are Frankenstein mega-projects. The New York Ave. project is too high, too wide, too dense for the area with little bungalows, cottages, and parking space less Walk houses right by this mega-project. Old Man Iorio says building a few single family homes the bank would not be interested in, so I need to build this mega-project and Long Beach has to let me do it or else the bank will not finance it. Well, Zoning Board his case is denied since the land is not a problem requiring a variance due to a land defect, rather the developer has a financing defect which does not require a variance!
Old Man Burger and Kreiger want a 120 foot high tower shoe horned into a very small lot with so little parking. This building is out of character with its neighbors as it is too tall above its neighbors and will look mismatched and ugly. This neighborhood has no parking already and cannot take the load of people and cars this building will dump on its neighbors who are already hurting for parking spaces. So, Zoning Board the answer is simple-- get out your DENIED stamps to both of these monsterously large and out of character megaprojects. If you say yes, you are giving these developers what they want and shafting the neighbors and all of Long Beach in the process.
paul.d.spellman October 26, 2012 at 02:00 pm
Lisa,
Please be clear. It should have read "we need housing that I "ME - LISA" can afford. Just because you do not have enough money to purchase one does not mean it is not affordable.
Bill Carls October 26, 2012 at 02:16 pm
paul.d.spellman wins again
LBLover October 26, 2012 at 02:17 pm
The building on Broadway is a great idea! We need another restaurant on the boardwalk. I want people who can buy a place for 2M in LB!
Eddie October 26, 2012 at 05:34 pm
Both lots were purchased under the current zoning. The developers should be held to the present zoning laws. It's that simple.
Unless you are in Long Beach. Here it's Pay-to-Play, where the proper contribution to the Democrats' City Council election campaign will buy you whatever you want. In the 1950's the Council went to jail for this sort of corruption.
Jimmy Hennessy October 26, 2012 at 06:34 pm
This is what we get when you elect a city council ridden with real estate interests and led by a party leader who also has real estate interests.
Farn Adelson, Real Estate Broker & City Council Member Scott Mandel, Real Estate Attorney & City Council Vice President Len Torres, Best friend to a Real Estate Broker & President MIke Zapson, LB Democrat Leader and real Estate Attorney Karen Adamo , LB Democrat Committeeman and Real Estate Broker This list goes on and one... This in administration is trying to pick up where they left off in 2004 by overdeveloping LB and using up every single piece of open space in LB and turning it into buildings. Its deja vu all over again. Let the congestion, overdevelopment, over crowding, less open space, more parking problems etc., begin....again Watch these videos: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oGD8DM5X9vk http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7XdsyzRQNA
Eddie October 26, 2012 at 07:20 pm
Videos? They are just slides of text. Why not just write it here, Jimmy, instead of insulting out intelligence with so called "videos".
The voters gave the Republicans a chance and they blew it with their own style of corruption. They lined the pockets of the Soffields and their own friends. The least of the evils? Hands down it's the Republicans. Thanks to the Democrats, my City taxes will go from $700 to $5300 in ten years. Shame on them.
BSM October 27, 2012 at 03:04 am
Our infrastructure really cannot continue to be taxed by building such large buildings. The parking is but one issue. Our water supply is serviced through pipes that probably qualify as antiques We are overtaxing our sewage treatment facilities. Builders have these pie in the sky dreams of creating a South Beach type of environment without ever considering the needs and wants of the people who have lived here and supported this city for years.
Joseph Kellard (Editor) October 27, 2012 at 07:52 am
A couple of corrections were made to the original article, including the proposed number of parking spaces to 42 (although zoning board trustees did say that when all is said and done there will be 23 spaces in all); and Joseph Iorio's quote, from 27 years to 27 units.
Ipick October 27, 2012 at 07:59 am
There is enough housing in the West End. Build another park for the kids.
Derek V October 27, 2012 at 08:14 am
The Boardwalk is 2 and a quarter miles long. Why do we want to permit a new restaurant right next door to to only one we have (albeit at poor quality and high prices). Why not insist that Allegra buy the property and use it as a car park instead of letting their Valets park customer cars all over town.
paul.d.spellman October 27, 2012 at 08:23 am
Derek, That is a great idea, what will you think of next? Perhaps you should insist your neighbor buy your computer so you can no longer provide such insightful suggestions.
paul.d.spellman October 27, 2012 at 08:24 am
Lpick,
A park is a great idea, you should approach the current owners, make a fair offer for the property and after purchasing it build a park.
Derek V October 27, 2012 at 08:52 am
My dear Mr Spellman, I said a "Car Park" not a "Park". The point is that Alegra should never have been permitted to convert the eyesore a hotel/restaurant without providing adequate car parking space for staff and patrons,
I don't need facetious idiotic comments; I don't see that they add anything useful to the discussion.
Eddie October 27, 2012 at 09:58 am
Paul's not being idiotic, but pointing out that in America, we have private property rights. Nobody "makes" a person buy property, build a park lose rights without compensation. The former nursing home had no parking. That's called "non conforming use," and it's difficult if not impossible to make a buyer now provide parking after he acquired a right not to have it.
When a developer increases density, the new taxes collected from the "improvement" is supposed to pay for new infrastructure to support it. But when your municipal government is corrupt; when it has no qualified engineering people on staff but instead pays political hacks, the tax revenues get absconded. Then the residents are stuck paying for emergency bonds to build infrastructure that should be provided by tax revenues.
Ipick October 27, 2012 at 10:41 am
Maybe I will.
paul.d.spellman October 27, 2012 at 12:38 pm
Derek,
I read and understood what you initially said, nowhere did I mention a "park" or a "car park" in my post to your insightful comment about "insisting" a private entity purchase another private property. Not only do you make very insightful statements, you also show a complete inability to follow and comprehend posts by others. Please do yourself a favor and re-read your post before hitting that post button.
paul.d.spellman October 27, 2012 at 12:41 pm
Ipick,
No you will not. Whilst you are very easy to give up the property of others, I highly suspect when it comes to your own property you rightfully watch over it, protect it and would do all you can to increase the worth of that property. And at the same time you would do all that you can to prevent it, if someone wanted to take it from you.
JP Ashcroft October 27, 2012 at 02:43 pm
unfortunately, these will pass because the City is in dire need of new tax revenue. It's humorous to note that Rocco has some reservations about density. On his watch, buildings went up without regard for existing homeowner complaints. Check to see who contributes to the Democratic club..........
Ellen A. October 27, 2012 at 07:14 pm
Manhattan is crowded, yet people want to live there. However it would be good if someone looked closely at how the new tax revenue would be applied in Long Beach. Could our present taxes be reduced with all the new revenue?? Or new services offered to the residents?
Eddie October 27, 2012 at 09:33 pm
Trust me, it has been looked at.
One more unqualified hack who contributes to the Democrat's campaigns can be hired in a new, unrepresented, non-civil service, management position.
LB Sand in my shoe October 28, 2012 at 05:35 pm
Holy Cow, I looked up the LB democrats contributors and guess what? Summit (Shokrian), 555 LB Realty (Iorio) and Rocco Morelli (ZBA Chairman) are all big time contributors to Zapson and the Dems. This is SICK! Plus Petry real Estate, and other realtor estate interests including Zapson law firm (Davidoff Malito, etc) who specializes in Real Estate Law and gave $2500!
http://www.elections.ny.gov:8080/reports/rwservlet?cmdkey=efs_sch_report+p_filer_id=C46618+p_e_year=2012+p_freport_id=K+p_transaction_code=B
Eddie October 28, 2012 at 07:47 pm
Duh.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Long Beach Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
AEA President June 18, 2013 at 04:46 pm
yes - by sheer coincidence, their employees work more overtime than ever before in their last 3Read More years of employment before retirement (as it so happens, their pension is based in part on their last 3 years of employment).
Jack Kett June 18, 2013 at 07:41 pm
Bottom line re: LIRR is that people in suburbs who ride LIRR and Metro North are paying to subsidizeRead More the bankrupt NYC Subways and subsidize minority riders in the outer boros. Its the price we pay to not live in NYC. The subways charges a cheap fixed fare to subsidize low income NYC residents. Its a form of socialism.
Joe June 18, 2013 at 08:19 pm
Jack, racist much? Why don't you go have a tea party with the rest of the little Republican girls?
Eddie June 18, 2013 at 02:55 pm
Great photos, Richard. With joists like those, you could drive a firetruck up that thing!
Eddie June 18, 2013 at 08:24 am
Sink hole repaired by the City by 6 PM. Great job by great guys.
Eddie June 16, 2013 at 09:53 pm
Because the Democrats fired all the engineers in City government and replaced them with politicalRead More friends.
Eugene Torres June 17, 2013 at 07:57 am
Heron St is like a bombed out war zone. Many of the residents drive the wrong way to avoid theRead More potholes at the beginning of the street.
AEA President June 18, 2013 at 06:45 am
Solomon why hast thou forsakeneth?
TJM June 18, 2013 at 12:56 pm
I'm glad I live in the Town of Hempstead No new taxes in Four years. The streets are clean and theRead More storm drains work. I had aead tree replaced for $170.00 byb the town. Read and weep Long Beac
Charlie Cheswick June 18, 2013 at 03:13 pm
"Working" storm drains like the one between Regent & Greenway on Lido Blvd?
jacqueline gay June 16, 2013 at 08:06 pm
Thank you for your comments... still looking
Dr. Sidney A. Stiebel June 18, 2013 at 07:40 pm
Paninis & Bikinis may still be hiring.
jacqueline gay June 18, 2013 at 09:18 pm
Thank you Dr Steibel
Susie Pennachio June 15, 2013 at 09:13 am
yeeeepppp i always see people trying to get thru it or go around it to get onto the beach
Jaime Sumersille (Editor) June 15, 2013 at 12:44 pm
Thanks for the notice, Ally! I posted this on Facebook to make people aware! - Jaime Sumersille,Read More Regional Editor, Nassau County
RackEmUp Gomez June 14, 2013 at 03:55 pm
Those murderers from Boston were students, right? How about importing some kids from Brooklyn thatRead More need help? Lets stop being patsys.
Eddie June 14, 2013 at 07:55 pm
More Patch Spam. Look up any charity on GuideStar and see their tax return. Then you can decide ifRead More you want to support their executives with your contributions.
Eddie June 13, 2013 at 05:45 pm
Sure, John, and the NSA will reply in a speedy fashion.
Me June 13, 2013 at 08:49 pm
What would be the basis for that demand? The govt only has to turn over exculpatory evidence orRead More evidence it intends to use against a defendant and as far as I know in a civil matter (especially divorce) the govt is generally not a party to the action so how would they be compelled to do so?
kevin June 14, 2013 at 04:38 am
Oh oh. I hope some of these attorneys don't snoop around my phone records cause I'm banging theRead More wives of 3 different attorneys and a handful of scumbag politician wives also.i hate politicians !!
oceanview June 14, 2013 at 10:43 am
Did Grace Industries have the contract for the firehouse in the west end?
Eddie June 14, 2013 at 01:27 pm
What is puzzling is a contract that carries no line-item pricing and FEMA legislation that requiresRead More line-item price specifications for reimbursement. I suppose the City/contractor will have to provide this later.
RackEmUp Gomez June 17, 2013 at 11:36 pm
How about the THOUSANDS of illegal apartments being rebuilt with FEDERAL money? Who gives a ratsRead More ass about the boardwalk? Lets get the multi-millions in untaxed cash from these thieving landlords.
RackEmUp Gomez June 14, 2013 at 05:55 pm
I dont agree with all or even most of Harveys politics but there is NO doubt that he is one theRead More greatest benefactors to Long Beach in its history.......maybe THE greatest. When he is gone the Tea Party scumbags that want to kill the sandy Bill in 2014 and also send your flood insurance off the charts will have one less voice speaking out against it.
LI Resistance June 16, 2013 at 09:17 pm
When Harvey is gone we will have less wasted money from the tax payers. Harvey is our benefactorRead More using our own tax money you idiots.
anonymous June 17, 2013 at 01:54 am
You guys still don't get it...yes...Harvey brings back "our" money. But why are he and theRead More rest of the politicians taking it in the first place? These politicians have you so bamboozled that as they bleed us dry you thank them for the privilege of doing it. All they have to do is say "it's for the children" and you take leave of your brains. Unbelievable...
RackEmUp Gomez June 14, 2013 at 09:16 pm
If one of the 17 was your son you may not be so flippant , you moron.
oceanview June 13, 2013 at 11:26 am
Who let these people run the shelter. They looked like con artists right from the start.
andy napolitano June 13, 2013 at 01:16 pm
@BSM if you read the post you would see it tells you to go to a Facebook site called Rescue Ink =Read More The Facts. On this site there is a copy of Rescue Inks's 2011 tax form which is public information. It shows right on that tax form how they only paid 6% of their income for the animals. Also it is in the contract (also public information) with the City Of Long Beach, that Rescue Ink is just "running" the shelter. The building is owned & maintained by the City which also pays all utilities & vet bills. You should do a little research yourself before you question us. We could never put up these "facts" unless they were true.
andy napolitano June 13, 2013 at 06:44 pm
What is the AEA stand for?
Eddie June 12, 2013 at 08:31 pm
Why not ask National Grid to charge me for a Hep Wanted ad for you too?
Kat June 13, 2013 at 03:01 pm
YAh glad you are coming back!!!!