A state assemblyman is accusing a Brookville-based agency serving the
special needs community with abusing his son at its residence in
Plainview.
Harvey Weisenberg, D-Long Beach, and his wife, Ellen, filed a federal
lawsuit Monday against AHRC Nassau, an agency which serves
developmentally disabled people in residential settings around Long
Island.
In the lawsuit, the Weisenbergs allege that their son was physically
and psychologically abused at the agency's Plainview living facility.
Weisenberg told Newsday:
"The thought of someone hurting him is almost unspeakably painful to
us," of his son Ricky, 54. "We will continue to speak out on his
behalf."
AHRC Nassau issued a statement Monday about the Weisenbergs'
lawsuit: "We are disappointed that our longtime friend would choose to
name us in a lawsuit of this nature," the statement said.
The elder Weisenberg is among the legislature's
leading advocates for the disabled. Weisenberg
grew up in Long Beach and was a teacher and police officer before entering public office. He and his wife have five children.
The lawsuit, filed in federal district court in Brooklyn, also makes
allegations against Dwayne Edwards of West Hempstead. Edwards, an
employee at the Plainview site at the time, verbally abused and hit
Ricky Weisenberg in the presence of others, the suit contends.
The incident took place three years ago, on April 9, 2009, the suit claims. The suit asks for unspecified damages.
Ricky Weisenberg, 54, suffers from cerebral palsy and can't speak. He
still lives at the Plainview facility, the elder Weisenberg said.
AHRC Nassau assists the developmentally disabled with housing and other services.
Weisenberg told
Newsday that he learned of the abuse charge from
AHRC Nassau officials in 2009. The agency was complying with
legislation authored by Weisenberg in 2007, requiring that guardians be
notified when allegations of abuse surface.
Newsday said Weisenberg filed the lawsuit three years afterward
because "we thought the authorities we went to would do something, but
they didn't."
According to AHRC Nassau's statement "the employee was immediately
relieved of his duties. An investigation was opened by an independent,
internal unit of AHRC Nassau and all parties were notified that day."
The investigation took one day and resulted in the firing of the employee, the statement said.
With reporting by Joe Dowd Become a blogger today!
Get started now
http://www.longislandpress.com/2012/10/01/pol-sues-ahrc-alleging-disabled-son-was-abused/
I was not answering a question, I was asking a question. Which I will ask again, how exactly has Harvey helped Long Beach? And it might do you good to follow your own posts regarding answer questions with questions.
You: How exactly has Harvey helped Long Beach. If that's not answering a question with a question....................!! Too busy for a p - contest. I'm done. Bunch of whiners !
I was not responding to you, I was simply asking a valid question. It was listed in the comments underneath yours but not in response to yours. The better patch from a few weeks ago allowed you to reply to a comment, this new format does not.
Have a great day everyone.
Mr Weisenberg is re-elected every election...why then?
Please follow along, I was not asked a question. I was the one asking the question.
OK PDS..you asked a question-you were not asked to respond...let it go. Why hasn't someone, anyone--- taken any of these 'allegations' a step further if they feel they've been wronged (monitarily or otherwise?).
Why did the voters elect Democrats to the Long Beach City Council when last time they were in office they raised taxes 25% and then said it was a mistake? Why? So they could raise them 50% this time! You may not have noticed -- since non-property-owners were given the vote, the electorate usually elects the boob who promises them the most stuff. Here's just one more example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpAOwJvTOio
It is very simple, please follow along, I will type slow. I asked a question, you gave a comment to which I responded to. Unable to formulate a rational response you resorted to name calling. Stanley then posted a comment referring to me and I explained the situation to him. Is that clear enough for you to understand?
As far as your opening statement 'are you kidding...' I have not been a resident of LB for decades-so in those years I had no political leanings nor did I know the politics of LB. How about: "You are entitled to your own opinions. You are not entitled to your own facts" Daniel Patrick Moynihan
I supplied facts. Now you state that you don't know much because you haven't lived in Long Beach for long. But you know enough to ask questions and then call those who answer you names when the answers don't coincide with your liberal agenda. Why was Weisenberg reelected? Look in the mirror.
And it must be 'people like you' who follow the Right's agenda...if you look in the mirror-you might not see a reflection. aka pau.d.spellman: You can type slow-you most certainly think slow-LET IT GO.
"aka pau.d.spellman:" what does that mean? "Who's name calling"? you are, when you were unable to respond in any fashion, you have a need to resort to name calling, because that appears to be the best you can offer.
It means what? Who told you it means that?
I am going to end my comments on this article right now. Perhaps whoever said Mr W can destroy people that look into his life (or something similar) is paranoid. I am done here. You all complain about taxes; you blame everyone under the sun, you blame the party in power now-it's all too familiar. GET INVOLVED INSTEAD OF WHINING.
I was not being sarcastic, I actually did type slow to help you understand what I was writing. Once again what did "aka pau.d.spellman:" mean? Something you made up?
You said "Too busy for a p - contest. I'm done." and posted again then posted " I am done here" and posted yet again and once again posted "-I am done here" and had another post.