This article was written by Henry Powderly.Wednesday's
presidential debate
between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney has ended, the last in a series of
debates that has engaged the nation. This time, foreign policy was the
topic, and both candidates came out swinging. But who won?
So far, pundits put the tally at one debate to Romney and one to Obama.
Let us know below!
For more news about the election, follow the Politics and Election group. Become a blogger today!
Get started now
Romney was out classed tonight.
Polls have found that a majority of poll takers find polls to be less threatening, while other polls seem to negate such on-line poll findings. However, when polling the poll administrators, poll results showed that web site polls have a margin-of-error of +/- 27.5%, virtually leaving ALL polls null and void. In polling the poll takers on these statistically significant poll results, 86.4% stated that they would never participate in another e-poll of any form or function. When queried in an exit-poll, pollsters asked poll takers if they would participate in a new poll to validate the results of the original poll in question. 99% responded in the affirmative, and the other 1% couldn't lift their heads off the keyboard, having spent 14-hours-straight in a single poll on global warning, skipping all three meals in the process. Question: Would you participate in this poll?
Unless women want to experience 'back alley' in their lifetime-vote Republican. Mission: Unseat the President. Then what? We don't know. Mission: Overturn R v W. Mission: Defund Planned Parenthood (97% of what they do is screen for cancer..breast, ovarian, cervical, uterine)..3% is birth control (and yes, that includes the choice of abortion). Back Alley, that's the Romney way.
Who won the debate? It doesn't really matter. But Obama has done so much to destroy our country in so many ways that it is time for a change. Hoping and praying that it comes soon.
Voting machines............huge conflict of interest (ours, not his).
The President destroyed our country? Talk about ridiculous. A tired rant...and not truthful AT ALL.
How about 19 MILLION young women murdered in abortatoriums around the USA and outside the USA the MAJORITY of abortion murders are of women. Thats not a war.......thats genocide. Also....in the USA...the mass murder of children was started by racists like Emma Goldman.
The biggest social issue in this country is the denigration of women through the slaughter of their unborn babies. Only Romney sees this as the holocaust it is. There are at least two Supreme Court positions coming up. A reelection of Barry would insure radical liberal or communist kooks in the Court. Just ask yourself -- is America better of now than it was four years ago? Not unless you're on welfare.
Ms. Goldman-I know all about her and what she stood for (and not all of it I agree with)-and since I'm talking about women's rights and women's health-she was jailed for distributing birth control...NOW, ISN'T THAT THE CRIME OF THE CENTURY ? ! And you...are you a racist-so many closeted racists have come out since the President was elected in '08 and all of them quick to call everyone else a racist. I've read what she said about 'negroes'..in a negative sense as well as the whites using blacks to stay in power....that doesn't sound racist to me.
Who will win the election-well-let's see come Nov 6th. If you want to keep our soldiers in 'war', if you want 10 Scalia's on the Supreme Court, if you have children who will come of Medicare and SS age sometime in the next 10 years or so to be faced with nothing, if you want women's health-they're reproductive health-to be in question...well, you know who to vote for for that...Romney/Ryan
Who will win the election-well-let's see come Nov 6th. If you want to keep our soldiers in 'war', if you want 10 Scalia's on the Supreme Court, if you have children who will come of Medicare and SS age sometime in the next 10 years or so to be faced with nothing, if you want women's health-their reproductive health-to be in question...well, you know who to vote for for that...Romney/Ryan
But, then, when the new moon prevails, and the light from the Milky Way is challenged by a building storm-front approaching from the east -- opaque and menacing, palpable, rumbling in the distance -- and you have yet to fashion your life-sustaining fire, it might also be wise to lower your pack, lie back on a flat rock, and count your blessings as you gaze into the charcoal ether above. Smile now, for with certainty, you will not be the same person that you were by the time the sunrise is upon you. You are being watched, my friend, and carefully guarded, and you will realize such truths when all is said and done. -- D. Huntington Cheresh, A True Believer, In Honor of the Autumnal Equinox on September 22, 2012, at 7:49 AM PST.
I'd personally like to hire you as a tutor, focusing on your objective analysis of the candidates, as well as your predictions for the presidential race. At no time during my past have I encountered such an astute, articulate, and measured pundit. Thus, I'm convinced that you, and you alone, will solve the political riddles that erode my reservoir of common sense on a daily basis.
Taurus, if you are so concerned about illegal abortion, you should consider being on the pill, problem solved. It seems people are finally waking up that is we as a country do not want to go over the cliff, we need Businesspeople in office to prevent that by balancing the budget and capping spending.
But my orignal point still is why does anyone think that Romney can do a better job with the economy? What magical strategy is he going to implement? He has never expressed any SPECIFIC changes or strategies -- except cutting rates. He has said he is going to get rid of deductions. Okay which ones? how is he going to limit that? Why will that drive growth? We had very high rates post WWII (with alot of deductions) and we had growth. The rates under Clinton (and Reagan) were higher on both earnings and capital gains then today and we had low employment and huge investment gains. We furhter lower rates with the bush tax cuts -- supposedly for 10 year period to spur the economy after the tech bubble burst (though the republicans were pushing tax cuts prior to the bubble bursting because we believed (questionable now) that we were running at a surplus). We had both great economic times under the Bush and horrible economic times. So why is further cutting rates going create jobs? He mentioned (at least the way i interperted it) giving everyone a 25k standard deduction in the last debate -- but he has never committed a number nor what he would limit -- and more importantly how those cuts would effect the economy and the deficit. All i know is that will probably raise the tax burden on many of the middle /upper middle class tax payers on long island who have large deductions for state and local taxes. Forget about what it does to the housing market since effectively it kills the interst deduction. Romney is telling you what you want to hear -- that he will fix everything, and we can do it by contributing less to society. What he isnt telling you is HOW.